Avoma vs Gladia

Head-to-head comparison of two leading transcription tools

A

Avoma

AI Meeting Lifecycle Assistant for revenue teams

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.6 G2 (350) โ†—
Basic Swedish Visit Avoma โ†— View Full Profile
VS
G

Gladia

French speech-to-text API with sub-300ms latency and confirmed Swedish support

Basic Swedish Visit Gladia โ†— View Full Profile

Feature Comparison

Feature Avoma Gladia
Swedish Support Basic Basic
User Rating
ratings come from different platforms โ€” not directly comparable
4.6/5 G2 โ†— N/A
Real-time Transcription Yes Yes
Speaker Diarization Yes Yes
AI Summaries Yes Yes
Action Items Yes No
Pricing Model subscription usage_based
Free Tier Yes Yes
Platforms Web, iOS, Android, Desktop app, Chrome extension, API, slack_app, teams_app API
Data Hosting United States only: "Avoma hosts all its software in Amazon Web Services (AWS) facilities in the USA." No EU data residency option whatsoever. Quoted: "100% EU data residency", plus "No training on your audio... verifiable in the DPA" and a Zero Data Retention option. NOTE: no on-premise/self-hosted option exists - if the record claimed one, it was wrong.
Company Location N/A N/A

How We Compare

This comparison is based on publicly available information from official product websites, user reviews, and our own research. We evaluate tools across 50+ criteria including features, pricing, integrations, and language support.

Swedish support levels are determined by testing transcription accuracy with Swedish language content and evaluating the availability of Swedish UI and documentation.

Last updated: 2026-10-05

Need more options?

Compare up to 4 products side-by-side with our full comparison tool.

Compare These Products View All Comparisons